Monday, June 28, 2010
Tuesday, March 16, 2010
Jonesing for Art
It's like my private virtual museum with a constantly changing show. Thanks Daily Painters!Time to turn art into food - check out this great event and get a little piece of art while helping feed those who could use a little support right now. www.circle-of-art.net
And here is my contribution to the end of a season "Snow Blossoms"
Sunday, August 2, 2009
Art Patron
Wednesday, January 7, 2009
Hola Daily Painters!
Friday, July 11, 2008
Saturday, June 14, 2008
New art smell
Wednesday, June 11, 2008
Time for Art - Employee Art Show
It's the most wonderful time of year at work -- for me. The annual employee art show - it is one of the most amazing things about where I work.
"Do you think you will see a woman in the White House within your lifetime?"In trying to convey this notion -- of which I used Clinton's recently failed bid for the Democratic nomination as a vehicle to carry this concept, I was frustrated at the misunderstanding and puzzled looks when showing the piece to a select few. ("It looks like a school kids diorama", "It doesn't really hang together without a written explanation; maybe you should just write about this subject instead..." "Are you trivializing Clinton?" "Are you in mourning that she lost?" "Are you a Republican or a Democrat?") I ended up ditching it as an entry into the show. (BTW, it was about female roles of power in America and what they are, where they are at, where they have been -- replete with scratched and chipped glass ceiling -- but even by having to explain this - I know it fails as a piece of art.)
Monday, May 26, 2008
Sunday, May 25, 2008
Saturday, May 17, 2008
Monday, May 12, 2008
Saturday, May 10, 2008
Frustrated Gardner
Monday, May 5, 2008
Stories
Sunday, April 27, 2008
Visitor
What does this have to do with art? I'm not really quite sure. Seeing as I only have an audience of one with this blog, I don't feel quite the need to perform the expected duties of art collecting musing... maybe that is what is happening with the bees and the birds who seem reluctant to come to my window.
Friday, April 25, 2008
Sunday, April 20, 2008
Facsimile of Art
I had never considered an original piece to be so different visually from reproductions. The actual piece was way better than I could have ever imagined -- and though the subject was unmistakably the image firmly rooted in my mind -- it was so much more. I could understand the 'greatness' of this piece, where as previously I never quite got what all the fuss was about.
Today there seems to a bit of an opposite problem. A number of the original pieces I have acquired on-line have paled a bit in comparison to the facsimile delivered by my monitor. In fact all but one of the pieces I have purchased have actually looked better on my computer. There is a luminosity that my monitor delivers that the actual piece seems to lack.
I have even noticed this in my own art attempts. An acrylic painting that I had been struggling with, looked so much better photographed and photo shopped a bit on my computer that it actually inspired me to go back to the original painting and give it a darker tonal wash -- things I may have been afraid of doing permanently to the original piece, I first tried out on my computer and this gave me confidence to go ahead and make improvements.
All the pieces that I have acquired that didn't look nearly as good as their on-line representation -- I've grown to love them for the aspects that make them different from what I first envisioned them to be, (it tends to be in the color palette.) Only one of the pieces was I pretty disappointed with in terms of how the colors were registered on my monitor -- shades of blue and taupe that ended up being school bus yellow. I think sometimes artist make adjustments to their on-line art images, trying to adjust their monitor to better reflect what they see... but given the wide variety of computer systems and hardware out there -- they can't possibly take into account how things will look across the net.
I'm including the computer altered image of the painting I was working on, that inspired me to go back and alter the painting.
Friday, April 18, 2008
In The Beginning...
The first time I considered purchasing a piece of art was during the coffee shop boom near the turn of our most modern century. Small oils, mostly rural farming scenes, were displayed on a reclaimed brick wall, pieces from the shop owner's artist sister-in-law. I visited the shop frequently for my favorite beverage and due to my snobbish coffee palette; this was one of only a few I would consider. The drive was nearly 60 miles from my home, (but less than one from my home to be).
The paintings were like welcoming neighbors to a village I was yet to be part of. At some point I no longer wanted to visit, I wanted ownership. Tentatively approaching the front counter, I was informed that the small painting of a twiggy tree in front of a barn - the one I wanted most -had sold. This marks one of my earliest and ongoing dilemmas in acquiring art; not being able to get what I finally decide upon. I used to think this was because I liked what everyone else did and that I was slow to make up my mind, (though one time I arrived 15 minutes into the outset of a show, swiftly and assuredly made up my mind, turned to the artist only to have them say that they has just sold the piece!) but I've had pieces lost in the mail, and one was even stolen from the artist studio before shipping.
The day I finally moved, a house warming gift was presented to me from my mother and sister. Wrapped in newspaper, I was sure it was a painting from the local coffee shop. It was one that was atypical of the artist's subject matter and was rather simple in that it was a small vase of peachy mums. I was glad for the gift and for the decision that I did not have to make.
The painting found its way on a small interior wall that is often viewed from the kitchen. I catch glimpses frequently... the flower colors complementing the ivory tone of the new walls in this old village.
The fit was instant and sure. A few years later, with the closing of the coffee shop, I hadn't anticipated the painting evolving into a token memory of a earlier time, but it did -- one I'm glad to have. It reminds me of the warmth and comfort I took in that coffee shop after traveling a distance on concrete encased roadways - it helps focus the smell of the coffee roast and the honey color of the wood floors in my memory -- and many cups of perfect espresso.
What am I?
When looking for blog names or domain names that would succinctly identify the purpose, I ran into prevailing tones and connotations that just didn't fit.
The not-quite-right list includes:
- Collector: I do not go from art gallery to art gallery with checkbook in hand. I don't get my name on show opening lists and plan my attendance attire with just the right well heeled but arty look. In fact, it is only a bit of extra money that I came into this year that has allowed me to purchase a small selection of equally small works. I don't expect this to be an ongoing resource, so most likely next year I will revert to an admirer. Not to mention, I see a collector acquiring exceptional (or at least decent), pieces and not necessarily having a clear plan for the piece in mind -- Storage as a destination in lieu of the perfect place at the moment. I couldn't imagine placing my discretionary income spent on art in a closet or a storage bin somewhere for the eventuality of its emergence (though I guess technically that is what my 401K is doing). Then too, there is collecting for purely speculative reasons (I have more to say on this in a future blog).
- Connoisseur: No expert here. Doesn't fit. I like what I like - sometimes I can tell you why, and sometimes not, but never from a perspective of an educated or trained eye in the art world.
- Fan: Again, doesn't fit. A fan implies an undiscriminating love, which removes the aesthetic discerning of what I like and what I don't. To me a fan would mean someone who loves all art, or all art produced from one artist, etc. That doesn't leave room for the judgment -- part of the process that I greatly enjoy. I'm too fickle to be a fan.
- Appreciator: Who doesn't appreciate art to some extent? I think this might speak to degrees of art appreciation, but I think also it implies someone who may have a technical knowledge that affords them a second level experience with a piece of work -- an appreciation for the skill, effort, challenge etc. The technical knowledge I do not have. I don't know if I have the ability to "appreciate", I'm still in the "like" or "don't like" camp with little ability to appreciate other aspects outside of my initial reaction.
- Enthusiast: Well, only until recently have I actively sought out art venues, (and primarily on-line), so nah... can't say that I am. (Though I've been enthusiastic enough about what I have been going through to want to create this on-line diary to track my journey.) I also think growing up with an artist doesn't allow me to be an enthusiast in the full sense of the word -- To a great extent, art was just a state of being from my earliest memories; it was every where, often piling up like lint in corners of rooms.
- Spectator: ? Well, clearly this is a sport based audience description -- doesn't really work as I liken this to cheering on things that don't always make sense to me. I'm thinking of things that may involve forms of what I consider violent human contact -- and though an emotion this does draw from me, (usually along the lines of shock and horror - both for what I'm viewing and for the realization that I'm often alone in the arena with my reaction), it is not the usual one evoked when I am viewing art.
- Patron: Definitely not. Though I support all artists trying to make it - I have nothing other than kind words and good thoughts to spur them on. I do not have a body of influence (either in friends, money or social standing), to qualify as a patron. And given the love hate relationship that sometimes exist between artists and their patrons, I'm not so sure I even want to be in the position to be a patron.
- Dilettante: Well, possibly, but there is a frivolous connotation with this description -- I don't take my attachment to art as frivolous -- It may not always be 'all consuming', or 'fully informed', but when I'm engaged, it feels pretty serious and powerful to me. And right or wrong, I have this image of some Victorian period female corseted and ruffled to absurd levels looking for things to fill empty time.
- Consumer: Though at may levels this works for me as it is devoid of the pompous aspects to many of the preceding descriptors, it is also cold and hard and reflects nothing of the passion that I feel when viewing art, (well, at least art that I like.) I also like the implication that there isn't necessarily a monetary exchange in consumption; you can consume art by merely visiting a show. You soak it in, develop a memory and recall it later, it feeds you and leaves an impression -- but I'm not so sure that others would instantly know this without a more evolved narrative context -- so yet another rejected word.
- Student of Art/Art Education: Since I have no intent to learn the detailed aspects of art creation, (and really there are so many types of art and materials and techniques -- not my interest to pontificate or even necessarily fully understand all), rather my intent is to focus on my experience as an observer and my reaction. Squarely I'm in the audience, not in the performance. (Though maybe more fully an audience member screaming at the edge of a stage, hands held high to catch the occasional contact or the occasional crossover from observer to participator.)
- Acquirer: Not dissimilar to why I don't like "collector" -- not only am I limited in my ability to acquire, (and not just from a monetary standpoint but from the point of space - storage and display -- as I don't live in a museum), there is the other added implication of ownership that I feel never quite applies to a piece of art. I can't truly own a piece, the artist always supersedes ownership by the mere act of creation - not to mention that there is a level of ownership from all who see the object. I feel I can only purchase the right to control where it's displayed and even that has an end date -- but who wants to talk about their own mortality?!
So what am I? I have searched a bit and seem unable to find a word that describes who I am with this intersection of art...
I am someone who wants to support the efforts of artist (like I mentioned, I grew up with several). When I have the funds, I want to vote with my dollars and support the charity of the artist quest, (100% of the funds go straight to the source if you buy directly!).
I want to purchase things that appeal to me, mean something to me, and that I can afford. (To be clear: I will choose food over art!) It is also important that I am able to live with the pieces I acquire - so context and environment of display have a significant consideration for me as well.
When the English language seemed unable to provide me with a descriptor that I felt rang true... I turned to foreign lands to see if there existed terminology to describe someone who wasn't an active artist or a full fledged patron; rather a casual collector, sometime producer and willing participant.
Perhaps in ancient cultures or in the study of sociology -- might they have come up with something sensitive enough to categorize this individual? Or is it just a matter of: either you are a full fledge connoisseur of art or you aren't? No room for shades of gray in this portrait I suppose.





